Modern 2:More on Square Wells and Review for Monday's Exam
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Start Hierarchy|link=Course Wikis|title=Course Wikis}} | ||
+ | {{Hierarchy Item|link=Physics Course Wikis|title=Physics Course Wikis}} | ||
+ | {{Hierarchy Item|link=Modern 2|title=Modern 2}} | ||
+ | {{End Hierarchy}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Before starting the review, I would like to go back and redo the infinite square well potential but with a slight variation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{mathematica|filename=paritystates_well.nb|title=a trivial Mathematica notebook with some plots of the results}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===review=== | ||
+ | |||
There is a review of important topics at the end of chapter 3, pages 58-59. I will go over this | There is a review of important topics at the end of chapter 3, pages 58-59. I will go over this | ||
in class today. But briefly, it includes the time dependent and time independent Schrodinger equations. | in class today. But briefly, it includes the time dependent and time independent Schrodinger equations. | ||
Line 9: | Line 20: | ||
In addition to this summary, you should understand | In addition to this summary, you should understand | ||
− | + | * the infinite square well sufficiently to be able to derive the energy eigenstates, the energy levels and normalization. | |
+ | |||
+ | * the eigenstates are orthogonal and complete. This lets us represent any wavefunction as a superposition of eigenstates. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * if the wavefunction IS an eigenfunction of some observable <math>\hat{A}</math> with eigenvalue <math>a</math>, the the measurement of <math>A</math> is equal to <math>a</math> with probability 1. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * it would be good to refresh your memory on Fourier series, in case I ask you to represent a non-eigenstate in terms of a superposition of eigenstates. E.g., a Gaussian. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | There are two potential problems that will be fair game for Monday's exam. First is the finite step potential: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>V(x) = V_0 \hbox{ if } 0 \leq x \leq a </math> and zero otherwise | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>V(x) = 0 \hbox{ if } 0 \leq x \leq a </math> and infinite otherwise | ||
− | + | A first order expectation would be that you can set up the solutions in the different regions (knowing under what circumstances you would get a propagating wave and under what you would get an exponentially damped (tunneling) state. Then you should be able to apply any boundary conditions. | |
− | + | I don't expect you to be able to derive the probability current (at least on an exam) but you should know how to compute it and you should understand it's physical significance. | |
− | + |
Latest revision as of 21:45, 13 March 2006
Course Wikis | > | Physics Course Wikis | > | Modern 2 |
Before starting the review, I would like to go back and redo the infinite square well potential but with a slight variation.
Download a trivial Mathematica notebook with some plots of the results |
review
There is a review of important topics at the end of chapter 3, pages 58-59. I will go over this in class today. But briefly, it includes the time dependent and time independent Schrodinger equations. Momentum space representation. The Heisenberg uncertainty relation (for x, p_x and E, t). The idea that to each physical quantity A there is an associated observable given as a self-adjoint operator . And that the expected value of a measurement associated with this quantity is given by .
In addition to this summary, you should understand
- the infinite square well sufficiently to be able to derive the energy eigenstates, the energy levels and normalization.
- the eigenstates are orthogonal and complete. This lets us represent any wavefunction as a superposition of eigenstates.
- if the wavefunction IS an eigenfunction of some observable with eigenvalue a, the the measurement of A is equal to a with probability 1.
- it would be good to refresh your memory on Fourier series, in case I ask you to represent a non-eigenstate in terms of a superposition of eigenstates. E.g., a Gaussian.
There are two potential problems that will be fair game for Monday's exam. First is the finite step potential:
and zero otherwise
and infinite otherwise
A first order expectation would be that you can set up the solutions in the different regions (knowing under what circumstances you would get a propagating wave and under what you would get an exponentially damped (tunneling) state. Then you should be able to apply any boundary conditions.
I don't expect you to be able to derive the probability current (at least on an exam) but you should know how to compute it and you should understand it's physical significance.