Week of 9/4

From Physiki
Revision as of 15:22, 8 September 2006 by Jscales (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Try the following notebook

Mathematica.png Download manipulating complex numbers in Mathematica.

Also, take a look at Mathematica Tips and Tricks.

A real amplitude and phase measurement. Top figure shows the amplitude of the transmitted and reflected electric fields. Bottom are the corresponding amplitudes. Click to download the annotated pdf.

Pdf.png Download amplitude/phase of measured E field

when is it ok to assume physical expressions are complex?

Consider the forced, damped, simple harmonic oscillator.

\ddot{x} + \gamma \dot{x} + \omega_0 ^2 x_r = F/m

Let's pretend that both x and F are actually complex variables. So we would write

x = x_r + i x_i \ \ \ \  F = F_r + i F_i \,

Plugging these into the equation above we get

\ddot{x_r} + \gamma \dot{x_r} + \omega_0 ^2 x_r +
i\left[\ddot{x_i} + \gamma \dot{x_i} + \omega_0 ^2 x_i\right] = F_r/m + i F_i /m

Now, whenever you have a complex equation this is equivalent to two real equations, among the real parts and the imaginary parts. Here we have

\ddot{x_r} + \gamma \dot{x_r} + \omega_0 ^2 x_r = F_r/m

and

\ddot{x_i} + \gamma \dot{x_i} + \omega_0 ^2 x_i = F_i/m

Now the trick is to solving real physical problems (at least linear ones) is to throw away the imaginary part.

Brief Digression on operators.

Pdf.png Download operators

Now back to the damped, forced Simple Harmonic oscillator

Resonance.gif

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox