Lab Report Format
| (6 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ''''THE REPORT MUST AT LEAST INCLUDE: '''' | |
| − | '''Abstract''' | + | -'''Abstract''' |
| − | '''Author Contributions''' | + | -'''Author Contributions''' |
| − | '''Model Section (theory)''' | + | -'''Model Section (theory)''' |
| − | '''Procedure, Data Analysis''' | + | -'''Procedure, Data Analysis''' |
| − | '''Discussion/Conclusions''' | + | -'''Discussion/Conclusions''' |
| − | '''References''' | + | -'''References''' |
| − | ''' | + | -'''IN ADDITION''' please include an appendix addressing the following points, which are associated with thinking critically about the lab : |
1.) Applying principles: what fundamental principles are associated with the model? | 1.) Applying principles: what fundamental principles are associated with the model? | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
3.) What assumptions did you make relating to how the apparatus appropriately tests the model? | 3.) What assumptions did you make relating to how the apparatus appropriately tests the model? | ||
| − | 4.) How do you know that the sources ( | + | 4.) How do you know that the sources (citations) you used are reliable? |
| − | 5.) Emphasis on supporting your conclusion with evidence | + | 5.) Emphasis on supporting your conclusion with evidence: what type of evidence are you using to draw the conclusion that the data do or do not support the model? |
6.) Assessing the impact of additional evidence: what additional ways could you have tested the model? | 6.) Assessing the impact of additional evidence: what additional ways could you have tested the model? | ||
Latest revision as of 21:47, 21 September 2017
'THE REPORT MUST AT LEAST INCLUDE: '
-Abstract
-Author Contributions
-Model Section (theory)
-Procedure, Data Analysis
-Discussion/Conclusions
-References
-IN ADDITION please include an appendix addressing the following points, which are associated with thinking critically about the lab :
1.) Applying principles: what fundamental principles are associated with the model?
2.) What assumptions did you make in the model?
3.) What assumptions did you make relating to how the apparatus appropriately tests the model?
4.) How do you know that the sources (citations) you used are reliable?
5.) Emphasis on supporting your conclusion with evidence: what type of evidence are you using to draw the conclusion that the data do or do not support the model?
6.) Assessing the impact of additional evidence: what additional ways could you have tested the model?
